The Think Twice Weekly Report compiles public education-related policy reports, research and articles of interest to policymakers, educators and stakeholders. This list is not exhaustive but is meant to highlight recent reports that may be used to support or undermine the work of our subscribers in supporting public schools. We encourage you to take a moment to scan these reports and determine if they may be used by policy makers to assist or erode your mission.
Policy Reports
Rigorous career-and-technical education (CTE) can give students an edge when they enter the workforce, while also benefitting employers seeking skilled workers. But just how many students in Ohio avail themselves to CTE opportunities during high school? And what does CTE look like when they participate in such programs? Conducted by Dr. Jay Plasman of The Ohio State University, this study provides an overview of recent trends in CTE participation across the Buckeye State. It includes deep-dive analyses of coursetaking patterns, industry-recognized credentials, and work-based learning.
Career and technical education (CTE) and apprenticeship share many common goals, combining workplace skills with academic knowledge. Yet, CTE and Registered Apprenticeship (RA) Programs have historically been separate systems in the United States. This began to shift a decade ago with public and philanthropic investment in youth apprenticeship programs. This report examines the available, although limited, data from emerging high-school-based (HS-based) RA programs to see how they align with and could better serve CTE programming and goals. With further alignment, CTE-based apprenticeships can become a scalable model serving the goals and students of both systems.
At a time when school choice is expanding rapidly and public interest is high, the need for trusted, accessible information has never been greater. That's why we're proud to release the 2025 EdChoice Bundle, a curated collection of five resources designed to give policymakers, advocates, journalists, and families a full picture of educational choice in America today.
This year's Bundle includes updated and renamed publications, new insights from our ongoing polling and research efforts, and, for the first time, a resource entirely focused on K–12 education funding. Together, these five guides form a comprehensive, plain-language foundation for anyone seeking to better understand the programs, policies, perceptions, legal context, and fiscal impact of educational choice.
Reports Reviewed
GLC seeks to ensure that policy briefs impacting education reform are based on sound, credible academic research. Below are reviews conducted with GLC support.
A recent report from the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty (WILL) examines publicly available test score data from Spring 2024 in Wisconsin to investigate the relative effectiveness and cost of school choice programs.
The report claims to provide evidence that private schools participating in the state's voucher programs and charter schools yield better academic results as compared with traditional public schools, but Benjamin Shear of the University of Colorado Boulder identifies several critical limitations in the data and analyses behind those claims. NEPC today published Professor Shear's review of WILL's Apples to Apples: The Definitive Look at School Test Scores in Milwaukee and Wisconsin for 2024.
What We're Reading
Research and articles that we want to highlight for subscribers as potential resources:
A judge's ruling on a challenge to Ohio's private school vouchers followed the money to conclude the program is unconstitutional.
In this commentaty piece, experts on education law and policy were invited to share their reactions to the Supreme Court's recent decisions this term.
"Amid efforts from the Trump administration to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education,2 privatize education,3 stop research projects that advance teaching and learning,4 and cut federal funding for public schools, 5 it is crucial that policymakers understand the impact these decisions will have on rural schools, which are already at a disadvantage with inequitable funding and limited access to rigorous educational opportunities. Rural schools' heavy reliance on state and federal funding means these attacks would create significant harm, leaving them without critical funding needed to keep their doors open and provide a quality education to the 9.8 million rural students nationwide.6"
"The Trump administration is tapping agencies other than the U.S. Department of Education to implement its agenda in schools, sometimes circumventing typical rulemaking procedures that would allow districts months to give feedback on and prepare for policy changes before they roll out. The use of other agencies to set or enforce education policy marks a significant shift from typical K-12 policymaking, some education policy experts say."